Brandie, et al,
First off, Brandie, thanks for your appreciation of Mr. Finzzz! He promises
to not run you down like his younger sister was prone to do to people. .
..however, I think you may have misconstrued some of the "original vs
customized" comments being left here. My comments were not a slam at
customizers, and I hope nobody thought I was whining about not having one
more $6 trophy.
Rather, I was saying that I won't anymore pay $30 to watch my rare car be
ignored in favor of some guy who just hopped down to the local custom shop
to buy a 6 inch steering wheel, a chrome blower, and brand new chrome
wheels. They can have their show. I'll keep my car, and the people, like
you fine folks on this list, who appreciate my car for what it is - is what
I'll enjoy. That, and of course driving it!! That's assuming I can get the
darned regulator to charge the gen, as that recurring problem has been
cropping up again lately. . .
Mark mjh
----- Original Message -----
From: Brandie Hannon <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, July 04, 2001 11:24 PM
Subject: [FWDLK] Fwd: [FWDLK] The price of showing off your FWDLK car
> Ok Guys,
> Now I'm steamed...No, I'm downright pissed off. I "mutilated" my
Belvedere
> for me, and if I never win a trophy with it even though I've spent a ton
of
> time on the car it's really no big deal. Maybe you all look at a car that
> isn't stock and see it as a shame, but you do really have to appreciate
the
> work, time, thought, and energy that those "rodders" you hate so much have
> put into these rolling works of art. I mean no disrespect to any of you
who
> choose to restore your cars to showroom condition-I appreciate the time
and
> energy that goes into the restorations, but your time and energy isn't
worth
> more than my time and energy just because your car is shiny and mine is
> primer.
>
> Just venting...
> Brandie in California
> "mutilated" 58 Belvedere KUSTOM!!
>
> P.S. BTW Mark- I think Mr.Finzzz kicks A**!!!
>
> In a message dated 7/3/01 8:54:40 AM Pacific Daylight Time,
> [email protected] writes:
>
> << Wow... I'm steamed myself just reading about this...
>
> IMO the guy who mutilated the Belvedere (and those who
> voted for it) are the ones who should be
> embarrassed...
>
> --- MARK J HASH <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> (snip)
>
> > The biggest embarrassment I felt was the day I
> > attended a MoPar Show n Shine event, where I was
> > shut out (which I have no problem with if the
> > winning cars are nice cars BTW), but the car
> > judged "Best of Show" was a '57 Belvedere which
> > until a year before had been a very nice
> > "survivor" but had since been turned into a
> > chopped, channelled beast with Frenched door
> > handles and a blower that extended literally
> > 3 feet out of the louvered hood. It impressed
> > the show goers and won the six foot high trophy,
> > while my '57 Fury, which the weekend before had
> > earned 98 out of 100 points at the Forest Grove
> > Concours, and took me 8 years to rebuild, lost in
> > the Fifties class to a '52 Cranbrook sedan with
> > no upholstery.
> >
> > So, now that I finally understand that restored
> > cars are basically ignored by most shows and
> > their attendees, I mostly just drive Mr. Finzzz
> > for myself and a few non-charging local shows,
> > and the occasional visitor who know the
> > significance of Exner's designs.
> >
> > Mark mjh
> > '57 Fury in OR
>
|
|
Back to the Home of the Forward Look Network