Re: [FWDLK] What Is It?
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [FWDLK] What Is It?



--- MARK J HASH <[email protected]> wrote:

> Since I'm from the school of the 'mechanically
> declined,' I'll ask the question:  what benefits
> would one derive from having the bearing journals
> finished .001 inch undersize or having the tappet
> bodies be .008 inch oversize?

No "benefits" per se; this simply allowed the factory
to use parts that varied from the blueprint standard,
altho in their opinion not by enough to render said
part unusable.
_________________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com



Home Back to the Home of the Forward Look Network


Copyright © The Forward Look Network. All rights reserved.

Opinions expressed in posts reflect the views of their respective authors.
This site contains affiliate links for which we may be compensated.