RE: My 67 valiant

What was the dollar amount on that build? I had no idea a 318 poly could make that kind of power. Step by step info would be real nice.

> From: glpavlovich@xxxxxxx
> To: 1962to1965mopars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; 318poly@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Fw: My 67 valiant
> Date: Sat, 12 Nov 2011 11:50:30 -0800
>
> I thought the "Polyheads" on these lists might enjoy reading Jason's
> comments on the mild 256/.435" Poly cam I sent for his cool Valiant; a link
> to his video at the end of this thread.\
>
> Gary Pavlovich
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Gary Pavlovich
> Sent: Tuesday, November 01, 2011 10:54 AM
> To: Jason Rhoades
> Subject: Re: My 67 valiant
>
> Great! Now you know why I like these motors. The 318 Poly will REV to the
> moon in stock stroke form, and seemingly well-beyond the cam profile's RPM
> Power limit. I cam I sent you is what we call "Little Big-Cam" and is the
> 1957 dual quad grind with some "improvements" to the original profile.
> Trucks have used this cam with outstanding results and have beaten NEW RAM
> and other brand pickups in various off-road races...
>
> I just send one of my friends a "large" solid Poly HP Cam along with a set
> of ported Poly heads as he wanted to go to the next level (faster) with his
> hot '64 Poly-Powered Polara. He did a few test runs and said he could
> barely hold the car with the power-braking method; it wanted to launch with
> his 3000stall convertor. When he let it go, he said the engine spun quickly
> to 7500RPM and was still pulling..."WOW!" was the exclamation in his e-mail
> story to me as well. The cam profile is 284/.510" ([email protected]")110LC. As
> expected, with only a Poly motor, there is no lack of "bottom-end" with this
> cam and Rich's engine/driveline package. Usually a "large cam" trades upper
> power for a reduction in low RPM power/or torque, but not here; he says
> appears to idle much smoother "down low" but this is also due to the ported
> heads superior breathing and subsequent increase in both HP & Torque under
> 3000RPM.
>
> A Stroked Poly has the best of both worlds as well; only like being on
> steroids. It doesn't behave as a typical stroked engine. The 390-402
> Stroker Poly will REV like a small block and make power like a big block;
> you should hear them on the dyno at 6000-6500RPM...they make music; much
> like a HEMI. I have all the Stroker videos but the files are usually too
> large to send over e-mail but I will try to send you one of the smallest
> files.
>
> You mentioned the GMC V-6 style of torque inherent in the 318 Poly; you can
> check out the 390 Stroker Poly dyno sheet of Jeremy's motor and see the very
> high & flat HP & Torque curve that just hangs high and flat like a deisel.
> Note the "average" HP & Torque levels; 428ft.lbs.TORQUE from 3400-5400RPM
> and 375HP from 3700-5700RPM. Even though the peak numbers are impressive at
> 412HP @5500RPM and 438TORQUE @ 3900RPM, it is the unmatchable high/flat HP
> & Torque Averages over this broad 2000+RPM range that will allow you to
> "take-on" the guy with a motor boasting much higher HP numbers as you will
> take him off-the-line and your inertia will put you at the lights before he
> winds up to reach his "peak" power; this is especially true against the
> Chevrolet small blocks.
>
> Bottom line, in either stock stroke 318 cid. profile or "long arm" Stroker
> versions, the modified Poly engine is unarguably your best choice of
> indigenous powerplant for the 450HP & 450 Torque and under requirements.
>
> Anyhow, keep me/us posted on your adventures and let me know if I can
> forward this post to the 62-65 Mail List and the 318POLY Yahoo list.
>
> Gary Pavlovich
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jason Rhoades
> Sent: Tuesday, November 01, 2011 9:31 AM
> To: Gary Pavlovich
> Subject: RE: My 67 valiant
>
> Wow . we flogged the poly Saturday and I must say I was supprised. That
> thing will wind up fast and tight. We tightened up the air door a little on
> the carb .otherwise it is just as you shipped it to me. Runs very well not
> too rich. And did I mention will swallow the 750 carb at 1500rpm in third
> gear. Gulp and gone!!! My friend that is helping me tune it was like see
> if you can dump the 4 barrels at 3 grand. I shoved it into 3 and nailed it
> at 1500 and said like that? He was dumbfounded we normally only play with
> big blocks and we think small blocks are sissy motors. But I think this one
> has monster torque down low. Drives like a gmc v-6 think 1960's v-6 I
> have a 401 magnum google them and you will see what I mean. But they will
> pull down to 500 rpm and keep pullng. This is the same way. Wow!!
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Gary Pavlovich [mailto:glpavlovich@xxxxxxx]
> Sent: Wednesday, October 26, 2011 5:38 PM
> To: Jason Rhoades
> Subject: Re: My 67 valiant
>
> Jason,
>
> Yes, 3.91 gears are too steep for that camshaft as well. That cam likes
> stock to 3.23 gears for effortless driving on the freeway and in-town
> traffic. However, you do have a bad 3.91 gear set which clouds the issue.
> Sure, whenever you are ready, I have all the cam profiles to suit your
> taste. A good street/strip combo for your car, much like a 340 setup but
> stronger, is the 264/.450" ([email protected]") 110LC solid cam profile or its
> 262/.460" ([email protected]") 110LC Hydraulic counterpart; I attached a video/sound
> byte of the 262HYD. cam for your smiles...nice.
>
> Gary
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jason Rhoades
> Sent: Wednesday, October 26, 2011 1:54 PM
> To: Gary Pavlovich
> Subject: RE: My 67 valiant
>
> SO IVE GOTTEN TO DRIVE THE CAR ABOUT 6-8 MILES NOW. AND MAN DO I HATE IT!
> THE 391 GEARS ARE KILLING ME. THEY MUST BE WELDED CAUSE THERE IS NO GIVE
> WHEN I TURN AND THE REAR END HOWL LIKE A RELLY BAD HOWLER. O WELL JUST
> MORE KINKS TO WORK OUT THE EXHAUST SOUNDS GOOD. USED CHAMBERED MUFFLERS AND
> 2" DROPS INTO 2-1/4 PIPE. COULDN'T GET ANYTHING BIGGER TO WEDGE UP TO THE
> MANIFOLDS. WINDS UP NICE. NEED TO DIAL IN THE ALIGNMENT ALSO . WANTS TO
> EXIT STAGE RITE. REAL BAD!! BUT WHEN I GOUGE ON THE GO PEDDAL AND ROW THE
> GEARS IT REALLY JUMPS. AWSOME!! CANT WAIT TO GETE THE INTERIOR FINISHED TO
> QUIET THE INSIDE UP A BIT. ILL GET SOME MORE PICS FOR YOU SOON. DEFFINATLY
> SHOULD HAVE A BIGGER CAM. NEXT TIME!
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Gary Pavlovich [mailto:glpavlovich@xxxxxxx]
> Sent: Monday, September 26, 2011 1:40 PM
> To: Jason Rhoades
> Subject: Re: My 67 valiant
>
> Jason,
>
> I love the look and paint color of your Valiant!!! What a great-looking
> car! Man, that Poly under the hood looks like a Big-Block, only better!
>
> The engine sounds "healthy." We call that 256/.435" ([email protected]") "Little Big
> Cam," because it runs soooo good for a small cam with very modest specs.
>
> Gary
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jason Rhoades
> Sent: Sunday, September 25, 2011 7:27 PM
> To: Joe Lemire ; Jeff Clawson ; Gary Pavolovich ; Marti Sacks
> Subject: My 67 valiant
>
> Check out this video on YouTube:
>
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=En2RJRuOmUA&feature=youtube_gdata_player
>
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> --
> --
> Please address private mail -- mail of interest to only one person -- directly to that person. That is, send parts/car transactions and negotiations as well as other personal messages only to the intended recipient, not to the Clubhouse public address. This practice will protect your privacy, reduce the total volume of mail and fine tune the content signal to Mopar topic. Thanks!
>
> 1962 to 1965 Mopar Clubhouse Discussion Guidelines:
> http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.org/mletiq.html and http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.com/general_disclaimer.html.
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The 1962 to 1965 Mopar Mail List Clubhouse" group.
> http://groups.google.com/group/1962to1965mopars?hl=en.